Leviticus

(All scripture quotations are taken from the NIV, unless otherwise indicated in the text.)

Introduction

The Bible book of Leviticus is a crude combination of two enormously dissimilar components. The first component, overwhelmingly larger than the second, concerns the continual ritualistic killing associated with the so-called priestly "Israelite" tribe of Levi.

The second component appears as isolated verses, or parts of verses, interspersed throughout the book. These conspicuously stand out in clear relief against the self-interest and gore of the first component.

This commentary will examine Leviticus as a whole, before listing what is hereby perceived to be the small amount of genuine, God-given instruction contained within it.

I desired mercy, and not sacrifice (Hosea 6:6 KJV)

Leviticus shows that its author was a Levite and that the tribe of Levi worshipped the Devil, for it is blatantly obsessed with blood and gore, death, destruction, injustice and sacrifice. It was probably therefore written by Aaron or by Ezra, both of whom were Levites.

The true author of Leviticus seeks to establish his own tribe as a ruling, privileged, priestly class, to be revered and provided for not only then, but throughout successive generations. He thus invents many reasons for bringing the priests food, and plays especially upon the conscience of the people en masse with such concepts as "burnt offering" (1, 6:5b-13), "grain offering" (2, 6:14-23), "fellowship offering" (3, 7:11-21), "sin offering" (4, 5:1-13) and "guilt offering" (5:14-19, 7:1-10). "The rest of the [particular] offering belongs to Aaron and his sons ..." (2:3,10 cf 3:5,8,11,16, 7:31). Notice, too, how the author foresees the likelihood of there being a glut of food at certain times and no food at others, and instructs the people to "add salt to all your offerings." (2:13.) However, so as not to give the game away, he deceitfully makes no mention of food preservation, but rather precedes his instruction with the implicit notion that the people would otherwise be guilty of withholding salt for personal benefit, as can be seen from the full verse, "And every oblation of thy meat offering shalt thou season with salt; neither shalt thou suffer the salt of the covenant of thy god to be lacking from thy meat offering: with all thine offerings thou shalt offer salt." (2:13, KJV.)

Animals "without defect" (1:3,10, 3:1,6, 4:3,23, 14:10, etc.) "and of the proper value" (5:15,18, 6:6, etc.) are to be given to the Aaronid/Levitical priest to slaughter and eat, to somehow pay the price of the sin of the person who brought it! "The priest who offers [the so-called sin offering that he has butchered] shall eat it" (6:26). "Any male in a priest's family may eat it; it is most holy." (6:29.) "Aaron and his sons shall eat the rest of [the grain offering]" (6:16). See also 6:17,18, 7:14,31-36, 14:13 and throughout.

Chapter 8 describes a ritual attributed to an Egyptian called Moses. This Moses, it is claimed, ordains Aaron and Aaron's sons as priests. It is likely that Moses really did exist, but who exactly was he? And what of Mount Sinai and the desert of Sinai (7:38), where are these? Some say Egypt, some say Saudi Arabia, some Iran and some Palestine. Why do we not know for sure where they are?

Chapter 11 instructs people that, for some reason, various creatures are "detestable" (11:10,12,13, etc). This leads both to the concept of created things being clean or unclean and to the concept of magic (11:32, etc). Notice also that the people who accept these complicated "laws" without questioning them would need to rely completely on the priest for their interpretation, as is further evident in Chapter 13 where reliance upon the priest for skin rashes and for mildew seem to ensure that the priests are going to have a constant supply of clothing and (probably) housing. Indeed, 14:33-47 places the priest in an excellent position to be bribed by builders and home owners, with priest-assessed mildew necessitating new stones, plastering, or even a new house altogether.

So, provide the "priest" and his family with food (preserved in salt, of course, because the so-called "atonement" is not simple blood-letting, but the subsequent eating of the animal) and the supplier of the meat would then be supposedly clean (14:19,20), as long as it was an animal "without defect" and of the correct "value." What does the necessary sacrifice depend upon? Wealth! (14:21-32.)

Sacrificial "atonement" is also claimed to be necessary for the bricks and mortar of the non-priest's house (!), as detailed in 14:48-53, and there is some ridiculous, blasphemous mumbo jumbo regarding ear lobes, thumbs and big toes in 14:14-18. How did Aaron or Ezra convince the poor, gullible people of this nonsense? Simple: claim that it was given privately by God to Moses, and that the meaning of it all is too deep a mystery to be understood by anyone except the local priest (also known as the Emperor's Jewish tailor).

Chapter 12 places guilt and the need for "atonement" upon a woman for being - wait for it - a mother! Such degradation of women is further encouraged in 27:1-8, where males are assigned more value than females, and women are made out to be unclean because of normal menstruation (which was designed when women were created, of course) in 15:19-24.

There is Talmudic black magic, freemasonry and debauchery in Chapter 16, including the introduction of the scapegoat that supposedly carries away all of the sins of the Ezra-ites (16:7-10 and 20-22). This concept of a scapegoat has been essential and indispensable to the Roman Catholic Church's Zionist movement; a movement that has, throughout history, committed innumerable atrocities and then deviously pinned the blame for them on all and sundry but themselves, for example on accidents (such as the 'Titanic'), Germany (World Wars I and II) and the Muslims (World Trade Centre, New York). As well as demonizing other people with false flag operations, the scapegoat concept has facilitated the Vatican to both steal the land of Palestine and to live off the immoral earnings of the "Holocaust" scam and the private central banks scam.

The author of Leviticus (i.e., Aaron or Ezra) had to take steps to look after his clan's interests in verse 17:5, where the Ezra-ites had to stop doing their own sacrifices "in the open fields. They must bring them to the priest [whoops], that is, [er] to the Lord ..." The creatures that the priests want in order to satisfy their carnivorous lust are termed "sacred contributions" (22:12), and "anyone eat[ing] a sacred offering by mistake ... must make restitution to the priest for the offering and add a fifth of the value to it." (22:14.) The flesh of killed animals is referred to in 22:25 as "the food of your god."

As for the remainder of this Devil-inspired garbage: 23:15-21 is characteristically vile, by calling for more and more "sacred contributions"; 23:42,43 deals with the "law" of living in booths (see Friedman); 23:33-36,39-41, etc., is numerology, and 24:5-9 is further looking after "Aaron and his sons."

Zionist philosophy rears its ugly head in 24:10-23, property rules and regulations (that again would mean reliance upon the priest) are invented in 25:13-34 and slavery is legitimized in 25:39-55.

The god (in Hebrew, "el") of Ezra (written right to left in Hebrew as Ezra el = Isra el = Israel) is revealed in 26:14-46 and particularly 26:27-45, as a spiteful, vindictive, discompassionate and irrational aggressor, as I believe Professor Richard Dawkins regularly asserts. Unbeknown to Prof. Dawkins, however, this god is the Devil (who the central character of the New Testament identifies as being the father of the Jews in Chapter 8 of Mary Magdalene's gospel).

The final chapter (27) is there in order to give enormous power to the priests in the name of their "god" and 27:1-13 seems to talk of human sacrifices.

Thus death, destruction, self-interest and mendacity, all desired by the Devil, constitute the major part of Leviticus. To say that this disgusting book was dictated to Moses by God is without doubt a lie and a blasphemy. The book is one long ritualistic slaughter of innocent animals from beginning to end, showing clearly that the god of the man who wrote it was the Devil.

And that author, in my opinion, was Ezra, who, in the manner that is so characteristic of a pathological liar, mixed just a little bit of truth in with the lies, so as to try and give credence to the whole thing.

Genuine scriptures found scattered within this otherwise vile and obscene Torah book:

• Do not steal. (19:11)
• Do not lie. (19:11)
• Do not deceive. (19:11)
• Do not defraud. (19:13)
• Do not curse. (19:14)
• Do not pervert justice. (19:15)
• Do not spread slander. (19:16)
• Do not use dishonest standards when measuring length, weight or quantity. (19:36)
• If anyone sins and is unfaithful to the LORD by deceiving his neighbour about something entrusted to him or left in his care or stolen, or if he cheats him, or if he finds lost property and lies about it, or if he swears falsely, or if he commits any such sin that people may do - when he thus sins and becomes guilty, he must return what he has stolen or taken by extortion, or what was entrusted to him, or the lost property he found, or whatever it was he swore falsely about. He must make restitution in full. (6:2-5a)
• Rebuke your neighbour frankly. (19:17)
• Do not do anything that endangers life. (19:16)
• Do not seek revenge. (19:18)
• Do not put tattoo marks on yourselves. (19:28)
• Rise in the presence of the aged, show respect for the elderly and revere your God. (19:32)
• You must not eat any fat or any blood. (3:17)
• Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable. (18:22)
• Do not have sexual relations with an animal. (18:22)